Delayed SARS-COV-2 clearance in infected persons in Ghana

Objective: This study aimed to determine the duration of SARS-CoV-2 clearance in persons in Ghana. The research question was whether the duration of virus clearance in Ghana matched the 14 days recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO); this had direct implications for transmission, which was key in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: This was a retrospective analytical study. Setting: All facilities that submitted clinical specimens to Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR) for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis between March to June 2020 were included in the study. Interventions: Samples from 480 persons who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR from March to June 2020 at NMIMR and submitted at least two follow-up samples were retrospectively analysed. Individuals with two consecutive negative RT-PCR retesting results were considered to have cleared SARS-CoV-2. Results: The median time from the initial positive test to virus clearance was 20 days (IQR: 5-56 days). This was six days longer than the WHO-recommended 14 days, after which infected persons could be de-isolated. Sputum and nasopharyngeal swabs proved more sensitive for detecting viral RNA as the infection progressed. At a significance level of 0.05, age and sex did not seem to influence the time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance. Conclusions: The median time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance in this study was 20 days, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infected persons in Ghana take longer to clear the virus. This finding calls for further investigations into whether patients who remain PCR positive continue to be infectious and inform isolation practices in Ghana.

Ethnological aspects of COVID-19

Abstract Within recent past, coronavirus has shaken the whole world. The world faced a new pandemic of novel coronavirus 2019 (SARS-CoV-2/ COVID-19).It has socioeconomically impacted world population a lot in terms of education, economy as well as physical and mental health. This novel coronavirus is notorious enough that put human health at a great risk. Currently, researchers all over the world aretrying hard to develop a new drug/vaccine for its treatment. In past decades, the world population has faced various viral infectious illness outbreaks. Influenza A, Ebola, Zika, SARS and MERS viruses had whacked public health and economy. Medical science technology achieved the landmark in developing coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines that are approved currently for emergency use. Some of the recently approved vaccines are developed by Pfizer and Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, Gam-COVID-vac (Sputnik V), Bharat Biotech (covaxin) andOxford-AstraZeneca vaccines (covishield) (Badenet al., 2021). Here, a short review is drafted focusingon infection, immune system, pathogenesis, phylogenesis, mode of transmission and impact of coronavirus on health and economy and recent developments in treating COVID-19

Análise fisiopatológica das manifestações clínicas respiratórias em pessoas infectadas pelo vírus SARS-CoV-2 / Pathophysiological analysis of respiratory clinical manifestations in people infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus

Na atualidade, a população mundial vive um dos momentos mais críticos e assustadores relacionados à área da saúde, onde a mutação viral da família do "coronavírus" trouxe o SARS-CoV-2, um agente patogênico que deriva da linhagem do SARS-CoV e MERS-CoV, e que ataca e debilita o funcionamento fisiológico, principalmente, do sistema respiratório. Vários países vivenciam a pandemia denominada "novo coronavírus", vale resaltar que a escolha do nome vem das várias formas já vivenciadas desse vírus, iniciando em 1937, com os primeiros isolamentos por manifestação dessa família viral. Assim, após a descoberta dessa nova mutação dos ancestrais virais, no final do ano de 2019, acontece seu primeiro surto na China. O objetivo desse artigo é analisar a fisiopatologia do "novo coronavírus" em busca das respostas orgânicas a esse ataque. Foi utilizada a metodologia em caráter de revisão integrativa descritiva e qualitativa de artigos indexados na plataforma PubMed, SciELO e por informações disponíveis no portal Manual MSD, Ministério da Saúde do Brasil e Organização Mundial de Saúde. Os resultados encontrados indicam que as alterações fisiopatológicas manifestadas na infecção por SARS-CoV-2, possuem as características estreitamente semelhantes às encontradas na síndrome respiratória aguda grave (SARS-CoV) e na síndrome respiratória do oriente médio (MERS-CoV), que são desencadeadas por outros patógenos da família coronavírus. Conclui-se que estamos lidando com um tipo específico de pneumonia e que possui um acometimento progressivo e fatal, levando a destruição de estruturas pulmonares indispensáveis para a difusão de gases (hematose).

Currently, the world population lives one of the most critical and frightening moments related to the health area, where the viral mutation of the "coronavirus" family brought SARSCoV-2, a pathogenic agent that derives from the SARS-CoV and MERS-Cov, attacking and weakening the physiological functioning, mainly, of the respiratory system. Currently, several countries are experiencing a pandemic called "novel coronavirus", emphasizing that the choice of name comes from the various forms already experienced of this virus, starting in 1937, with the first isolations due to the manifestation of this viral family. Thus, the discovery of this new mutation of viral ancestors, at the end of 2019, happens its first outbreak in China and has spread throughout the world in a fast and incessant contamination, surprising health professionals who seek more and more knowledge and property to understand and treat the victims of this pandemic. The purpose of this article is to analyze the pathophysiology of the "novel coronavirus" in search of organic responses to this attack. The methodology was used as an integrative descriptive and qualitative review of articles indexed on the PubMed, SciELO platform and information available on the portal of the Ministry of Health of Brazil and the World Health Organization (WHO). The results found indicate that the pathophysiological changes manifested in the SARSCoV-2 infection have the characteristics closely similar to those found in the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV) and in the middle east respiratory syndrome (MERSCoV) that are triggered by other pathogens of the coronavirus family. It is concluded that we are dealing with a specific type of pneumonia and that it has a progressive, rapid and fatal involvement, leading to the destruction of pulmonary structures indispensable for the diffusion of gases (hematosis). It still has action on the production of secretion causing respiratory distress destining its victims to death

Manifestaciones extrapulmonares de COVID-19. Una revisión / Extrapulmonary manifestations of covid-19. A review

La enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (covid-19) se presenta en una amplia variedad de cuadros clínicos que van desde formas completamente asintomáticas o leves hasta una enfermedad rápidamente progresiva, incluidas manifestaciones pulmonares y extrapulmonares. El SARSCoV-2, el agente etiológico del covid-19, accede a sus células diana a sistema renina-angiotensina. Esta enzima se expresa en células endoteliales vasculares, epitelio tubular renal, células de Leydig en los testículos, pulmones, riñones, cerebro, corazón, vasculatura y tracto gastrointestinal. ,,,,,, Como tal, las manifestaciones clínicas del covid-19 se explican por la distribución tisular de la ECA-2. Más allá de la afectación tisular "per se", otra característica patológica es el fenómeno de la "tormenta de citocinas" (CS). El CS es una respuesta inmune exagerada caracterizada por un alto nivel de citocinas inflamatorias circulantes sostenidas en el tiempo. Es rápidamente progresivo y tiene una alta mortalidad. El CS se ha detectado en pacientes críticos con covid-19 y se considera una de las principales causas de síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda (SDRA) e insuficiencia multiorgánica. Los niveles séricos de citocinas proinflamatorias aumentan significativamente en pacientes con causar inflamación y lesión del sistema nervioso central (SNC). Respaldando este punto de vista, los niveles de IL-6 se correlacionan positivamente con la gravedad del covid-19. Este síndrome se ha descrito en sepsis, síndrome hemofagocítico y en otras infecciones por coronavirus como el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo (SARS) o el síndrome respiratorio de Oriente Medio (MERS). Aunque la afectación pulmonar se ha descrito bien en muchos informes, las manifestaciones extrapulmonares todavía están mal descritas. Este artículo revisará las manifestaciones no pulmonares del covid-19. Los principales síntomas extrapulmonares comprenden los neurológicos, cardíacos, oftalmológicos, musculares, hematológicos, cutáneos y gastrointestinales, así como la afectación hepática y renal. Cada una de estas manifestaciones puede surgir durante la evolución de la enfermedad o construir su manifestación inicial

Coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) presents in a wide variety of clinical pictures ranging from completely asymptomatic or mild forms to rapidly progressive disease, including pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations. SARS-CoV-2 ­the etiological agent of covid-19- access to their target cells via a transmembrane protein, the angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2). ACE-2 is a type-I metallocarboxypeptidase with homology to ACE, an essential enzyme in the Renin-Angiotensin System. [1] This enzyme is expressed in vascular endothelial cells, renal tubular epithelium, Leydig cells in the testes, lungs, kidneys, brain, heart, vasculature, and gastrointestinal tract.[2-7] As such, the clinical manifestations of covid-19 are explained by the tissular distribution of ACE-2. Beyond the tissular affectation "per se", another pathological feature is the "cytokine storm" phenomenon (CS). CS is an exaggerated immune response characterized by a high level of circulating inflammatory cytokines sustained over time. It is rapidly progressive and has a high mortality. CS has been detected in critical patients with covid-19 and it is considered a major cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiorgan failure. Serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines are significantly increased in patients with ARDS, and their levels are positively correlated with mortality.[8, 9] CS may also cause inflammation and injury of the Central Nervous System (CNS) Supporting this view, IL-6 levels positively correlate with covid-19 severity.[10] This syndrome has been described in sepsis, hemophagocytic syndrome and in other coronavirus infections like the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) or the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Although lung involvement has been well described in many reports, extra-pulmonary manifestations are still poorly described. This paper will review the non-pulmonary manifestations of covid-19. Main extra-pulmonary symptoms comprise the neurologic, cardiac, ophthalmologic, muscular, hematologic, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal ones, as well as hepatic and renal involvement. Each one of these manifestations can arise during the disease evolution or constitute their initial manifestation.

Review and Prospects of Pathogen Detection Related to Autopsy of Coronavirus Infectious Diseases / 法医学杂志

In the past, coronavirus caused two serious human-to-human pandemics in the world, including severe acute respiratory syndrome （SARS） and Middle East respiratory syndrome （MERS）. In late 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 （COVID-19） caused another major global public health event. Due to the strong infectivity of novel coronavirus, it is difficult to carry out the autopsy of related death cases widely. This paper reviews the previous status of the pathogen detection related to the autopsy of coronavirus infection diseases, and introduces the ongoing detection methods of novel coronavirus in clinical practice, in order to provide reference for the pathogen detection and study related to autopsy of COVID-19.

Transfusión de plasma convaleciente de pacientes con COVID-19 / Transfusion of convalescent plasma from patients with COVID -19

RESUMEN Actualmente no existe vacuna disponible ni medicación específica contra la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). El tratamiento se basa fundamentalmente en medidas de soporte. En este contexto, se han aprobado múltiples terapias de potencial utilidad para su uso en ensayos clínicos, como la transfusión de plasma convaleciente (TPC). Se realizó una búsqueda en PubMed de estudios sobre plasma convaleciente y COVID-19, SARS o MERS. Los estudios sobre la eficacia clínica en enfermedades causadas por otros coronavirus (SARS-CoV y MERS-CoV) evidenciaron mejoría clínica, aumento de anticuerpos neutralizantes, disminución de la mortalidad y ausencia de eventos adversos durante y después del tratamiento. En el caso de la COVID-19, se encontraron 13 estudios en pacientes con la COVID-19 grave y crítica. Aunque existen limitaciones en la metodología, en el número de pacientes y en los protocolos para el análisis del plasma convaleciente de los donantes, los pacientes que recibieron TPC evidenciaron mejoría clínica, mejoría de patrones ventilatorios, resolución de lesiones pulmonares, disminución de mortalidad, mejoría de parámetros laboratoriales, aumento de anticuerpos neutralizantes, disminución de carga viral y baja frecuencia de eventos adversos.

ABSTRACT There is currently no vaccine available and no specific medication against Coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19). The treatment is mainly based on support measures. In this context, several potentially useful therapies have been approved for use in clinical trials, such as convalescent plasma transfusion (CPT). PubMed was searched for studies on convalescent plasma and COVID-19, SARS or MERS. Studies on clinical efficacy in diseases caused by other coronaviruses (SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV) showed clinical improvement, increase of neutralizing antibodies, decreased mortality and absence of adverse events during and after treatment. We found 13 studies on this type of treatment used in patients with severe and critical COVID-19. Despite limitations regarding methodology, number of patients and the protocols for the analysis of donors' convalescent plasma, patients who received CPT showed clinical improvement, improvement of ventilatory patterns, resolution of lung injuries, decreased mortality, improvement of laboratory parameters, increase of neutralizing antibodies, decreased viral load and low frequency of adverse events.

SARS-CoV-2: previous coronaviruses, immune response, and development of vaccines / SARS-CoV-2: coronavirus previos, respuesta inmune y desarrollo de vacunas

Abstract Since the emergence of the new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in China at the end of 2019, when its characteristics were practically unknown, one aspect was evident: its high contagion rate. This high infection rate resulted in the spread of the virus in China, Europe, and, eventually, the rest of the world, including Mexico. At present, around 9 million people are infected, and around 470,000 have died worldwide. In this context, the need to generate protective immunity, and especially the generation of a vaccine that can protect the world population against infection in the shortest possible time, is a challenge that is being addressed in different countries using different strategies in multiple clinical trials. This opinion article will present the evidence of the induction of immune response in some of the viruses of the coronavirus family before COVID-19, such as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV (Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus). The information collected about the induction of an immune response by SARS-CoV-2 will be presented, as well as a description of the vaccine candidates reported to date in the various ongoing clinical trials. Finally, an opinion based on the evidence presented will be issued on the potential success of developing vaccine prototypes.

Resumen Desde el surgimiento del nuevo coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus tipo 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo severo) en China a finales del año 2019, cuando todavía era desconocido prácticamente en todos los aspectos, una característica era evidente: el alto índice de contagio entre la población. Esto resultó en la expansión del virus en China, Europa y, finalmente, en el resto del mundo, incluyendo México. Actualmente, alrededor de 9 millones de personas están infectadas, y han muerto cerca de 500,000 en todo el mundo. En este contexto, la necesidad de generar inmunidad protectora y, sobre todo, el desarrollo de una vacuna que pueda proteger a la población mundial contra la infección en el menor tiempo posible, es un reto que se está abordando en distintos países utilizando diversas estrategias en múltiples ensayos clínicos. En este artículo de opinión se presentan las evidencias de la inducción de respuesta inmunitaria con algunos de los virus de la familia de coronavirus previos al SARS-CoV-2, como el SARS-CoV (coronavirus del síndrome respiratorio agudo severo) y el MERS-CoV (síndrome respiratorio por coronavirus de Oriente Medio). Además, se presenta lo reportado hasta el momento acerca de la inducción de respuesta inmunitaria por el SARS-CoV-2, así como una descripción de los candidatos a vacunas informados hasta el momento en los distintos ensayos clínicos en curso. Finalmente se emite una opinión, basada en las evidencias presentadas, acerca del éxito potencial de los prototipos de vacunas en desarrollo.

COVID-19, ACE -inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: The need to differentiate between early infection and acute lung injury / COVID-19, y IECA -inhibidores y bloqueadores de los receptores de angiotensina: la necesidad de diferenciar entre una infección temprana y una lesión pulmonar aguda

SARS-CoV-2, along with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, forms part of the three highly pathogenic coronaviruses identified since the start of the millennium.1,2 While SARS-CoV was identified on 2003 and MERS-CoV on 2012, the initial reports of SARS-CoV-2 (the etiological agent of COVID-19) were first released at the end of December 2019.3,4 Now, after less than four months, the virus has distributed globally and has become the focus of extensive medical research, as the number of cases keeps rising.A significant part of the investigative effort has been directed to the search for an effective therapy or intervention that could stop the spread of the disease or be used to effectively treat infected patients. Likewise, potential predisposing factors to develop a more severe clinical presentation are progressively being identified. Some of the more relevant are older age and the presence of certain comorbidities, such as cerebrovascular and coronary heart disease, hypertension and diabetes.5­8 It is important to highlight that the last two are chronic conditions commonly treated with ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin II type-I receptor blockers.9­11 However, the evidence suggests that these medications can upregulate the expression of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the cellular receptor for both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2.11­16 Thus, a group of researchers hypothesized that ACE2-increasing drugs could raise the risk of infection and prompt a more severe clinical course or a fatal outcome in diabetic and hypertensive patients.

¿Qué lecciones nos dejará el covid-19?: Historia de los nuevos coronavirus / What lessons will the covid-19 leave us? History of the new coronaviruses

Los coronavirus han estado presentes entre los humanos hace décadas, causando entre el 10 - 30% de los resfríos comunes en los humanos. Dos coronavirus han causado pandemias y alertas globales en las últimas décadas: SARS-CoV Y MERS-CoV. SARS-CoV-2 es el séptimo coronavirus en generar una infección en humanos, y el tercero en generar una pandemia. En este artículo, presentamos y comparamos la cronología, epidemiología y las medidas de control de cada una de las pandemias: SARS, MERS y COVID-19. (AU)

Coronaviruses have been present in humans for decades, causing 10-30% of common colds in humans. Two coronaviruses have caused global pandemics and alerts in recent decades: SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh coronavirus to generate an infection in humans, and the third to generate a pandemic. In this article, we present and compare the chronology, epidemiology, and control measures of each of the pandemics: SARS, MERS and COVID-19. (AU)

Coronaviruses: a review of their properties and diversity

Human coronaviruses, which hitherto were causative agents of mild respiratory diseases of man, have recently become one of the most important groups of pathogens of humans the world over. In less than two decades, three members of the group, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV, and SARS-COV-2, have emerged causing disease outbreaks that affected millions and claimed the lives of thousands of people. In 2017, another coronavirus, the swine acute diarrhea syndrome (SADS) coronavirus (SADS-CoV) emerged in animals killing over 24,000 piglets in China. Because of the medical and veterinary importance of coronaviruses, we carried out a review of available literature and summarized the current information on their properties and diversity. Coronaviruses are single-stranded RNA viruses with some unique characteristics such as the possession of a very large nucleic acid, high infidelity of the RNA-dependent polymerase, and high rate of mutation and recombination in the genome. They are susceptible to a number of physical agents and several chemical agents used for disinfection procedures in hospitals and laboratories. They exhibit considerable genetic and host diversity, causing diseases of gastrointestinal and respiratory system in a wide range of vertebrate hosts including humans. The high prevalence of coronaviruses in domestic and wild animals, especially bats and birds, and the propensity for their genomes to undergo mutation and recombination may lead to emergence of new coronaviruses that could pose a serious threat to human and animal health

Terapia medicamentosa para infecções por coronavírus em humanos: revisão sistemática rápida / Pharmacological therapies for patients with human coronavirus infections: a rapid systematic review

Resumo O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar efeitos de tratamentos medicamentosos para infecções por coronavírus. Revisão sistemática rápida com buscas nas bases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, BVS, Global Index Medicus, Medrix, bioRxiv, Clinicaltrials.gov e International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Foram incluídos 36 estudos avaliando alternativas medicamentosas contra SARS, SARS-CoV-2 e MERS. A maioria dos estudos incluídos foi conduzida na China com delineamento observacional para tratamento da COVID-19. Os tratamentos mais estudados foram antimaláricos e antivirais. Nos antimaláricos, a metanálise de dois estudos com 180 participantes não identificou benefício da hidroxicloroquina em relação à negativação da carga viral via reação em cadeia de polimerase em tempo real e o uso de antivirais comparado ao cuidado padrão foi similar em relação aos desfechos. As evidências científicas disponíveis são preliminares e de baixa qualidade metodológica, o que sugere cautela na interpretação dos dados. Pesquisas que avaliem a eficácia comparativa em ensaios clínicos randomizados, controlados, com tempo de acompanhamento adequado e com os métodos devidamente divulgados e sujeitos à revisão científica por pares são necessárias. Recomenda-se atualização periódica da presente revisão.

Abstract This work aimed to evaluate the effects of drug therapies for coronavirus infections. Rapid systematic review with search in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, BVS, Global Index Medicus, Medrix, bioRxiv, Clinicaltrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases. Thirty-six studies evaluating alternative drugs against SARS, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS were included. Most of the included studies were conducted in China with an observational design for the treatment of COVID-19. The most studied treatments were with antimalarials and antivirals. In antimalarial, the meta-analysis of two studies with 180 participants did not identify the benefit of hydroxychloroquine concerning the negative viral load via real-time polymerase chain reaction, and the use of antivirals compared to standard care was similar regarding outcomes. The available scientific evidence is preliminary and of low methodological quality, which suggests caution when interpreting its results. Research that evaluates comparative efficacy in randomized, controlled clinical trials, with adequate follow-up time and with the methods properly disclosed and subject to scientific peer review is required. A periodic update of this review is recommended.

Eficácia da máscara facial (TNT) na população para a prevenção de infecções por coronavírus: revisão sistemática / Effectiveness of the use of non-woven face mask to prevent coronavirus infections in the general population: a rapid systematic review

Resumo O objetivo deste artigo é avaliar a eficácia das máscaras faciais padrão tecido não tecido (TNT) para a prevenção de doenças respiratórias (MERS CoV, SARS-CoV e SARS-CoV-2) na população. Foi realizada busca nas bases de dados Medline, Embase, Cinahl, The Cochrane Library, Trip. Também busca complementar no Google Acadêmico, Rayyan e medRxiv. Não foram aplicados filtros relacionados a data, idioma ou status de publicação. Títulos e resumos foram rastreados e, posteriormente, textos completos foram avaliados. Foram incluídos três estudos: um ensaio clínico randomizado tipo cluster e duas revisões sistemáticas. O ensaio clínico indica benefício potencial de máscaras médicas para controle da fonte de infecção, para a doença respiratória clínica. Em uma das revisões sistemáticas, não foi possível estabelecer relação conclusiva entre uso da máscara e proteção contra infecção respiratória. Por fim, outra revisão sistemática demonstrou que máscaras são eficazes na prevenção da propagação de vírus respiratórios. As evidências apontam para benefício potencial das máscaras faciais padrão TNT. Para o cenário atual de pandemia por COVID 19, recomenda-se educação sobre uso adequado de máscaras, associado a medidas individuais de proteção.

Abstract Objectives: to evaluate the effectiveness of non-woven face masks for the prevention of respiratory infections (MERS CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) in the population. Methods: search in Medline, Embase, Cinahl, The Cochrane Library, Trip databases. Google Scholar, Rayyan and medRxiv were also consulted for complementary results. No filters related to date, language or publication status were applied. Titles and abstracts were screened, and later, full texts were evaluated. Results: three studies were included: a randomized cluster clinical trial and two systematic reviews. The clinical trial indicates a potential benefit of medical masks to control the source of clinical respiratory disease infection. In one of the systematic reviews, it was not possible to establish a conclusive relationship between the use of the mask and protection against respiratory infection. Finally, another systematic review indicated that masks are effective in preventing the spread of respiratory viruses. Conclusion: Evidence points to the potential benefit of standard non-woven face masks. For the current pandemic scenario of COVID-19, education on the appropriate use of masks associated with individual protection measures is recommended.

Clinical features of coronavirus disease 2019 in children: a systemic review of severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome, and coronavirus disease 2019 / 中国当代儿科杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To systematically summarize the clinical features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children.@*METHODS@#PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Weipu Database, and Wanfang Database were searched for clinical studies on COVID-19 in children published up to May 21, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened the articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the studies included. A descriptive analysis was then performed for the studies. Related indices between children with COVID-19 and severe acute respiratory syndromes (SARS) or Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) were compared.@*RESULTS@#A total of 75 studies were included, with a total of 806 children with COVID-19. The research results showed that the age of the children ranged from 36 hours after birth to 18 years, with a male-female ratio of 1.21 : 1. Similar to SARS and MERS, COVID-19 often occurred with familial aggregation, and such cases accounted for 74.6% (601/806). The children with COVID-19, SARS, and MERS had similar clinical symptoms, mainly fever and cough. Some children had gastrointestinal symptoms. The children with asymptomatic infection accounted for 17.9% (144/806) of COVID-19 cases, 2.5% (2/81) of SARS cases, and 57.1% (12/21) of MERS cases. The children with COVID-19 and MERS mainly had bilateral lesions on chest imaging examination, with a positive rate of lesions of 63.4% (421/664) and 26.3% (5/19) respectively, which were lower than the corresponding positive rates of viral nucleic acid detection, which were 99.8% and 100% respectively. The chest radiological examination of the children with SARS mainly showed unilateral lesion, with a positive rate of imaging of 88.9% (72/81), which was higher than the corresponding positive rate of viral nucleic acid detection (29.2%). Viral nucleic acid was detected in the feces of children with COVID-19 or SARS, with positive rates of 60.2% (56/93) and 71.4% (5/7) respectively. The children with COVID-19 had a rate of severe disease of 4.6% (31/686) and a mortality rate of 0.1% (1/806), the children with SARS had a rate of severe disease of 1.5% (1/68) and a mortality rate of 0%, and those with MERS had a rate of severe disease of 14.3% (3/21) and a mortality rate of 9.5% (2/21).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Children with COVID-19 have similar symptoms to those with SARS or MERS, mainly fever and cough. Asymptomatic infection is observed in all three diseases. Children with COVID-19 or SARS have milder disease conditions than those with MERS. COVID-19 in children often occurs with familial aggregation. Epidemiological contact history, imaging examination findings, and viral nucleic acid testing results are important bases for the diagnosis of COVID-19.

Replication and transmission mechanisms of highly pathogenic human coronaviruses / 浙江大学学报·医学版

The three known human highly pathogenic coronaviruses are severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, (MERS-CoV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Human highly pathogenic coronaviruses are composed of non-structural proteins, structural proteins and accessory proteins. Viral particles recognize host receptors via spike glycoprotein (S protein), enter host cells by membrane fusion, replicate in host cells through large replication-transcription complexes, and promote proliferation by interfering with and suppressing the host's immune response. Human highly pathogenic coronaviruses are hosted by humans and vertebrates. Viral particles are transmitted through droplets, contact and aerosols or likely through digestive tract, urine, eyes and other routes. This review discusses the mechanisms of proliferation and transmission of highly pathogenic human coronaviruses based on the results of existing research, providing basis for future study on interrupting the transmission and pathogenicity of human highly pathogenic coronaviruses.

Replication and transmission mechanisms of highly pathogenic human coronavirus / 浙江大学学报·医学版

The three known highly pathogenic human coronaviruses are severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Human highly pathogenic coronaviruses are composed of non-structural proteins, structural proteins, accessory proteins and ribonucleic acid. Viral particles recognize host receptors via spike glycoprotein (S protein), enter host cells by membrane fusion, replicate in host cells through large replication-transcription complexes, and promote proliferation by interfering with and suppressing the host's immune response. Highly pathogenic human coronaviruses are hosted by humans and vertebrates. Viral particles are transmitted through droplets, contact and aerosols or likely through digestive tract, urine, eyes and other routes. This review discusses the mechanisms of replication and transmission of highly pathogenic human coronaviruses providing basis for future studies on interrupting the transmission and pathogenicity of these pathogenic viruses.

Similarities and Differences of Early Pulmonary CT Features of Pneumonia Caused by SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV: Comparison Based on a Systemic Review / 中国医学科学杂志(英文版)

Objective To compare the similarities and differences of early CT manifestations of three types of viral pneumonia induced by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), SARS-CoV (SARS) and MERS-CoV (MERS) using a systemic review. Methods Electronic database were searched to identify all original articles and case reports presenting chest CT features for adult patients with COVID-19, SARS and MERS pneumonia respectively. Quality of literature and completeness of presented data were evaluated by consensus reached by three radiologists. Vote-counting method was employed to include cases of each group. Data of patients' manifestations in early chest CT including lesion patterns, distribution of lesions and specific imaging signs for the three groups were extracted and recorded. Data were compared and analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Results A total of 24 studies were included, composing of 10 studies of COVID-19, 5 studies of MERS and 9 studies of SARS. The included CT exams were 147, 40, and 122 respectively. For the early CT features of the 3 pneumonias, the basic lesion pattern with respect to "mixed ground glass opacity (GGO) and consolidation, GGO mainly, or consolidation mainly" was similar among the 3 groups (=7.966, >0.05). There were no significant differences on the lesion distribution (=13.053, >0.05) and predominate involvement of the subpleural area of bilateral lower lobes (=4.809, >0.05) among the 3 groups. The lesions appeared more focal in COVID-19 pneumonia at early phase (=23.509, <0.05). The proportions of crazy-paving pattern (=23.037, <0.001), organizing pneumonia pattern (<0.05) and pleural effusions (<0.001) in COVID-19 pneumonia were significantly lower than the other two. Although rarely shown in the early CT findings of all three viral pneumonias, the fibrotic changes were more frequent in SARS than COVID-19 and MERS (=6.275, <0.05). For other imaging signs, only the MERS pneumonia demonstrated tree-in-buds, cavitation, and its incidence rate of interlobular or intralobular septal thickening presented significantly increased as compared to the other two pneumonia (=22.412, <0.05). No pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and lymphadenopathy was present for each group. Conclusions Imaging findings on early stage of these three coronavirus pneumonias showed similar basic lesion patterns, including GGO and consolidation, bilateral distribution, and predominant involvement of the subpleural area and the lower lobes. Early signs of COVID-19 pneumonia showed less severity of inflammation. Early fibrotic changes appeared in SARS only. MERS had more severe inflammatory changes including cavitation and pleural effusion. The differences may indicate the specific pathophysiological processes for each coronavirus pneumonia.

Diagnosis, treatment, control and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 and coronavirus disease 2019: back to the future / 生物工程学报

The ongoing outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as named by the World Health Organization has millions of confirmed cases around the world and has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives. The virus was named SARS-CoV-2 in February by International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. COVID-19 presents as fever, dry cough, dyspnea, headache and pneumonia. In a small subset of severe cases, the disease quickly progresses to respiratory failure and even death. Since the 21st century, there have been three major outbreaks caused by human coronaviruses, including the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) that broke out in 2003, the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) in 2012, and the recent pandemic of COVID-19. Since 2003, significant progress has been made in the study of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV concerning their natural origins, pathogenesis, antiviral development and vaccine design. Since SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV are closely related, previous findings on SARS-CoV are highly relevant to a better understanding as well as diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2. In this review, we highlight recent progresses in the field; compare the biological characteristics of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2; summarize the urgently-needed diagnostic, treatment, prevention and control options; and provide future perspectives for the outcome of the outbreak and research questions to be answered, including some of the difficulties in vaccine development. Hopefully, our comments and suggestions would prove useful for the control of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in China and the world.

Strategies for vaccine development of COVID-19 / 生物工程学报

An epidemic of acute respiratory syndrome in humans, which appeared in Wuhan, China in December 2019, was caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). This disease was named as "Coronavirus Disease 2019" (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 was first identified as an etiological pathogen of COVID-19, belonging to the species of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronaviruses (SARSr-CoV). The speed of both the geographical transmission and the sudden increase in numbers of cases is much faster than SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). COVID-19 is the first global pandemic caused by a coronavirus, which outbreaks in 211 countries/territories/areas. The vaccine against COVID-19, regarded as an effective prophylactic strategy for control and prevention, is being developed in about 90 institutions worldwide. The experiences and lessons encountered in the previous SARS and MERS vaccine research can be used for reference in the development of COVID-19 vaccine. The present paper hopes to provide some insights for COVID-19 vaccines researchers.

2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease Outbreak and Molecular Genetic Characteristics of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2

The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreaks that emerged in Wuhan city, Hubei province, have led to a formidable number of confirmed cases that resulted in >5,700 deaths globally, including 143 countries in all 6 continents. The World Health Organization declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern with a very high level of global risk assessment. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the agent of COVID-19, has >79% nucleotide sequence homology to SARS-CoV; therefore, both belong to the genus betacoronavirus and subgenus sarbecovirus. The S1 domains of the two appeared to share the cellular receptor ACE2, but revealed a much higher S1-ACE2 binding affinity. As seen in many other human coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 also shows respiratory infection, but the basic reproductive number (R₀) in transmission and the clinical latency are quite dissimilar from those of SARS- or MERS-CoVs. Many scientists infer that the time point of cross-barrier transfer from bats to mediate animals or to humans should be a rather recent event based on the full-length genome analyses obtained from the very first patients. Copy-choice polymerization, which often leads to a significant genome recombination rate in most coronaviruses, predicts the continued emergence of novel coronaviruses.